|
|
The
Underlying Technology
|
|
The
Importance of Evaluating the Underlying Technology It has been my experience that far too many companies select and purchase accounting software without having a clue about the product’s underlying technology. Even today DOS-based applications written in Cobol continue to sell at record-breaking levels. I believe that the root cause of this madness is that many companies focus their evaluations on features, features, features – and little else. It seems that as long as the product has a given set of features, it doesn’t matter what the underlying technology consists of. It could be a system written in FORTRAN using a VisiCalc database and running on an original Nintendo box, and many people would still purchase the product as long as it has a few obscure features that they feel are important to their company.
Why
is this important? Let’s think about this logically. Technology changes very
rapidly – you already know that. Many current technologies will be obsolete in
just a few years, or in some cases, just a few months. Old technologies are not
made obsolete by “new technologies”, they are made obsolete by
“improved technologies”. What I mean is newer technologies are
better technologies that offer more power, more functionality, more
capabilities. Eventually newer technologies overshadow older technologies to
monumental degrees.
Look
at it this way. Most older accounting software solutions contain far more lines
of complex code compared to a similar product developed with more current
technologies. In 1995, Gary Harpst of Solomon Software excitedly showed me their
latest Solomon IV product that was written in Microsoft Visual Basic. Gary
touted how Solomon was able to develop an extensive solution with just 300,000
lines of code compared to 15 million lines of Cobol code used to develop the
older Real World product line. Since then Solomon has increased its lines of
code more than five-fold – but it is still lean and mean compared to other
Cobol based products. Consider for a moment how much faster a company could
review or debug a product, or add functionality to product that contains
dramatically fewer lines of code. All other factors being equal, surely the
product with equal power but dramatically fewer lines of code will have a
brighter and stronger future ahead – right?
To
learn a little about the various programming languages in use today, please
refer to my personal notes on Programming Languages here:
http://www.accountingsoftwareadvisor.com/topics/programinglang.htm
When
evaluating the underlying technology of a product, it is also important to
inquire about the product testing effort put forward by the accounting software
publisher. You can find out why I think this is so important here:
http://www.accountingsoftwareadvisor.com/topics/testing.htm
It
is also important to find out whether the application is a 16-bit, 32-Bit,
64-Bit, or 128-Bit application. To learn what it means to be a 32-bit
application, I’ve explained it in simple terms here:
http://www.accountingsoftwareadvisor.com/topics/32bit.htm
When
it comes to a product’s underlying technology, there are many facets to
consider. To help make sure that you cover all of the appropriate bases,
presented below are a list of the questions you should ask when evaluating a
product’s underlying technology.
Understanding Programming Language Tool Sets
Before
a publisher uses a development language, they first develop a set of tools to
compliment that language. For example, an accounting software product typically
contains about 6,000 user screens. Each screen will probably have the same look
and feel in terms of size, font, color, border, etc. In this case, the publisher
develops a tool which automatically creates a new blank user screen with the
click of a button. In this manner, the programmer does not have to recreate the
wheel each time a new user screen is created. Instead, the programmer clicks a
button and the predefined screen pops up, and the programmer modifies the screen
from there.
It
is important to understand this because publishers often give names to their
respective tools sets. For example, Great Plains is written in “C”, but the
tool set that Great Plains used to compliment “C” is called Dexterity. Some
people falsely assume that Dexterity is the actual programming language, but it
is not. It is merely a tool set that Great Plains developed to help programmers
write code with greater efficiency and accuracy. Navision goes even further.
Navision Attain is also written in “C”, but they refer to their programming
language as C/SIDE. “C” being the programming language, and “SIDE” being
their internally developed tool set plus an integrated database. Because
Navision’s tool set is very extensive and integrates the database, the company
claims that this makes the “product fast to implement, easy to customize, and
simple to use and maintain”. |
|
|
|
All rights reserved No part of this web site may be used for commercial purposes of any kind without our express written consent. ______________
Read our Mission Statement Contact the Editor - J. Carlton Collins, CPA
__________________
Click Here If
You Need Help |